Does Simplifying After Applying L'Hopital Rule Affect the Limit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kreizhn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    l'hopital
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find
\lim_{x\to0} \frac{\arcsin(x)-x}{x^3}

The Attempt at a Solution


This is obviously an indeterminate form, so we apply L'hopital's rule to get

\lim_{x\to0} \frac{\frac1{\sqrt{1-x^2}} - 1 }{ 3x^3}
which is again an indeterminate form so we apply it again to get
\lim_{x\to0} \frac{(1-x^2)^{-\frac32}}6 [/itex]<br /> from which the solution is obviously \frac16.<br /> <br /> However, this is my question. After the first application of L&#039;Hopital, we could have simplified<br /> \lim_{x\to0} \frac{\frac1{\sqrt{1-x^2}} - 1 }{ 3x^3} = \lim_{x\to0} \frac{1-\sqrt{1-x^2}}{3x^2\sqrt{1-x^2}}<br /> This is no longer an indeterminate form and would suggest that the limit does not exist. Is there any justification for why this can&#039;t be done? Possibly, do we know that either: 1) This simplification is not permitted after applying L&#039;Hopital or 2) We know the limit exists and is finite and so are forced to apply L&#039;Hopital yet again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think lim x->0 of (1-sqrt(1-x^2))/(3*x^2*sqrt(1-x^2)) isn't indeterminant? It looks like 0/0 to me.
 
Haha, yes. The ability to subtract has apparently escaped me. Thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top