I Does spacetime have potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether spacetime possesses potential energy and if an object with higher potential energy has increased mass, referencing E=mc^2. It suggests that in a Newtonian framework, gravitational fields can be modeled with positive energy density, implying a relationship between potential energy and mass. However, General Relativity complicates this view, as potential energy does not function in the same way, leading to debates over the correct conservation laws. The conversation also touches on the concept of zero point energy, which is the lowest energy state of the universe, and its implications for the stability of empty space. Overall, the relationship between spacetime, potential energy, and mass remains a complex and nuanced topic.
IvicaPhysics
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Does spacetime have potential energy, and does an object with more potential energy have more mass? (E=mc^2)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
IvicaPhysics said:
Does spacetime have potential energy, and does an object with more potential energy have more mass? (E=mc^2)
What do you think potential energy is and how do you think spacetime would have any of it? Regardless of spacetime, how would potential energy lead to more mass?

EDIT: and by the way, I do not mean my questions to be a comment one way or the other on the answer to your questions, I'm just asking you to clarify your understanding of your terms.
 
IvicaPhysics said:
Does spacetime have potential energy, and does an object with more potential energy have more mass? (E=mc^2)
One way to model gravity in many cases is to extend the Newtonian view and say that there is positive energy density ##g^2/(8 \pi G)## in the gravitational field, in a similar way to the energy in an electric or magnetic field, and that an object with more potential energy has its mass adjusted accordingly (usually by some negative amount relative to some reference potential at infinite distance from the source). This then gives a global conservation law similar to Poynting's Theorem in electromagnetism. In that sense, both of your questions could be answered with "Yes".

A more accurate and general model is to use General Relativity. In that model, potential energy as a concept doesn't really work, although in simple cases it gives similar predictions to the Newtonian model. The energy of a gravitational field in GR is not "energy" in the normal sense but there are ways of allowing for it and expressing a conservation law for something like the Newtonian "energy" using a pseudotensor quantity, although there are varying opinions about which is the right expression to use, as the conservation law does not uniquely select a particular pseudotensor.
 
This looks suspiciously like a vacuum energy [aka zero point energy] question. In which case it would imply this potential energy could somehow be extracted and put to use. In principle ZPE is the ground state of the universe, or the lowest possible energy at which empty space can remain stable. If it were any higher it would spontaneously bleed off into lower energy regions with which it was causally connected. Were it any lower it would leech energy from connected higher energy regions. The consequences of this could be highly undesirable [inimical with life as we know it]. Given that empty space is at least as ancient as the universe, this appears to be a highly unlikely scenario. The universe was in a higher energy state in its infancy, but, that excess energy was exhausted by various processes [e.g., inflation and freeze out into matter] until it reached its current stable zero point value.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top