Does the bond between atoms affect Thermal Expansion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermal expansion coefficients (TEC) of cobalt-based and manganite-based perovskite cathodes, highlighting that cobalt-based cathodes exhibit higher TEC due to weaker Co-O bonds compared to Mn-O bonds. This weaker bonding is suggested to enhance oxygen ion mobility, leading to better ionic conduction. The comparison between La0.3Sr0.7CoO3-x and La0.65Sr0.3MnO3-x indicates that differences in the La to Sr ratio may affect the validity of the TEC comparison. Additionally, the structural implications of the ABO3 perovskite framework are explored, particularly how the size difference between Co and Mn influences oxygen ion mobility. Overall, the bond strength between atoms significantly impacts thermal expansion and ionic conduction in perovskite materials.
null void
Messages
102
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


From a journal I read that the cobalt-based perovskite cathode usually has better ionic and electrical conduction but higher TEC compare to Maganite-based perovskite cathode. Because of the Co-O bond is weaker than Mn-O bond.

e.g.
Cobalt-based perovskite cathode, La0.3Sr0.7CoO3-x has thermal expansion coefficient(TEC) at around 20x10-6K-1 while La0.65Sr0.3MnO3-x with TEC around 10 x10-6K-1
...probably this is not a very good comparison because the La to Sr ratio is a little bit different...

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it because of the weaker bond of Co-O bond, the mobility of Oxygen ion increase thus better ionic conduction; And the Co-O make further distance because of weaker bonding force when heat is apply causing high TEC value.

...extra question...sorry can't change the thread tittle...
And i did read somewhere before about the peroskite structure, ABO3, where A is the larger atoms at 8 corner of the unit cell and B is the smaller cation at the center of the unit cell, and if A is much larger than B in radius, the gap in the unit cell is bigger so the oxygen ion can move through the gap easier. I found that Mn and Co is in same row in period table, just Co has 2 extra electron and proton compare to Mn so its size is smaller...probably not much smaller, but does this size difference affect the mobility of oxygen ion too?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top