Does the Buchner funnel have a better alternative with less loss?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biochemgirl2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the efficiency and practicality of using Buchner funnels versus sintered glass funnels for suction filtration in laboratory settings. While Buchner funnels are commonly used and effective, concerns about transfer loss when using filter paper lead to exploring alternatives. Sintered glass funnels, available in various pore sizes, can perform comparably to Buchner funnels but eliminate the need for filter paper, which can be a logistical advantage. However, they are more expensive and may complicate cleaning, as residues can be harder to remove from the glass. The choice between these options largely depends on the specific application, sample size, and cost considerations, with micropore PTFE filters noted for minimal loss but not suitable for all scenarios. Overall, Buchner funnels remain a reliable choice for larger crystals and slower filtration processes.
Biochemgirl2002
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
the Buchner funnel is used often in the lab, but i was wondering if there was a great enough transfer loss in the filter paper to switch to an alternate funnel for filtering by suction. I've looked into sintered glass funnels but i don't know if it would have the same transfer loss since the substance could get sucked through the holes as well.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Sintered glass funnels come with different pore sizes (usually listed as fine, medium, coarse, or some variation thereof). They work about as well as a Buchner funnel with a piece of filter paper, but they're a bit more convenient in that you don't have to go begging for filter paper when you run out. That said, the Buchner funnel is usually fine as long as 1) you're crashing out decent sized crystals, and 2) you do the filtration slowly. You can always refilter if stuff pulls through.
 
  • Like
Likes Biochemgirl2002
Consider cost. Buchner and paper are cheap, sintered glass is expensive.
 
It would depend on your application. Small samples can suffer serious losses when using large filters. The filters I have used with the smallest losses is micropore PTFE filters but they aren’t the best for all applications.
 
KevinMcHugh said:
Consider cost. Buchner and paper are cheap, sintered glass is expensive.

and isn't it more difficult to clean, and to know when you have sufficiently cleaned of stuff stuck in the glass afterwards?
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top