Does the equation N = No e¯kt represent Radiation Strength?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexandra7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Strength
AI Thread Summary
The equation N = No e¯kt is discussed in relation to the transmission of radiation through biological samples of varying thickness. It is suggested that this equation accurately represents the strength of radiation as it accounts for the exponential decay of intensity due to absorption in tissue. The distinction between exponential and Poisson decay processes is noted, highlighting that the choice depends on the product of the decay constant and the thickness of the material. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding how radiation interacts with biological tissues. Overall, the equation is deemed relevant for analyzing radiation strength in this context.
Alexandra7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that we are working with biological samples of 5 and 10cm, is our assumption that the equation N = No e¯kt
represents the radiation strength accurate? Explain.

Homework Equations


N = No e¯kt

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm completely stuck but...

I believe it represents the transmission of a radiation beam through a given thickness of biological tissue. Sounds like radiation strength to me :c

Please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you have a decay process, like light propagating inside something, and gets absorbed, you can either assume that the decay to be exponential or poissonian. This depends on the product ##k x## ...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Proving the Equation: <N> = 1 / exp (E-U)/KT +1 from Zg = 1 + Exp (-E-U)/KT
Replies
15
Views
2K
Partial pressure ratio of gases at different altitudes
Replies
2
Views
3K
Bending strength of timber and modulus of elasticity.
Replies
5
Views
3K
A Why are the Navier-Stokes equations inconsistent in this case?
Replies
18
Views
2K
Phase space diagram for a spring in simple harmonic motion
Replies
1
Views
2K
Double slit problem with glass block
Replies
2
Views
10K
Radioactive samples and differential equations
Replies
7
Views
2K
Questions about diodes, relativity, radiations
Replies
1
Views
5K
What Is the Effective Target Area per Argon Atom?
Replies
3
Views
4K
Maximizing Planck's law using Taylor polynomial for e^x
Replies
28
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top