Does the load on a transformer affect its efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between transformer load and efficiency. A transformer with a 400:200 turns ratio, operating at 200 V and 2 A, has an efficiency of 50%. When a 50Ω lamp is connected, the output power is 200W, but replacing it with a 100Ω lamp reduces the output power to 100W, leading to a calculated efficiency drop to 25%. The confusion arises from the assumption that primary power remains constant regardless of load, which is incorrect; efficiency is influenced by the load connected to the transformer. Understanding this relationship clarifies how load affects transformer performance.
Quadratic64
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A transformer has 400 primary coils and 200 secondary coils. The primary voltage is 200 V, and the current is 2 A. A lamp is connected to the secondary coil. The efficiency of this transformer is 50%. Find the resistance of the lamp.

Homework Equations



V=IR
η=P in / P out
P=IV
Np/Ns=Vp/Vs

The Attempt at a Solution



From the turns ratio and the primary voltage, I found that the secondary voltage is 100 V. Since the efficiency is 50% and the input power is 200V*2A=400W, the output power is 50%*400W=200W. The current is 200W/100V=2 A.

Now I have the current and voltage on the secondary side, so I should be able to use V=IR to find the resistance of the lamp. So R=V/I=100V/2A=50Ω.

4. My question

But I also noticed something strange about this problem. What happens if I replace the 50Ω lamp with a 100Ω lamp? The induced voltage in the secondary coil is the same (100V), but using V=IR, I get that the current is 100V/100Ω=1 A. Therefore, the power is 1A*100V=100W, and the efficiency of the transformer must be η=100W/400W=25%.

My conclusion seems very counter-intuitive, since I don't understand how changing the load can change the efficiency of a transformer. The efficiency should only be based on the characteristics of the transformer itself (the energy lost in the windings and the core), not the devices that I connect to it. Is there something wrong with the problem, or was the way I solved it incorrect? I can't find much information about efficiency on the Internet, so any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mistake is in assuming that no matter how much power is used in the secondary, the power in the primary is constant. Using this logic, you can easily get the power in the secondary greater than in the primary, which is manifestly impossible.
 
So when I connect the 100Ω lamp, the secondary power is 100W. Then the primary power Pp=Ps/η=100W/50%=200W. Therefore, the current on the primary side will be reduced to I=P/V=200W/200V=1 A. Am I correct?
 
Correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top