Does the Pauli Exclusion Principle Apply to All Types of Particles and Atoms?

Kahsi
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Does it include all types of particles? All atoms?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope.It applied only to electrons in atomic electron shells (the original 1925 formulation due to W.Pauli,which earned him a Nobel Prize).

Daniel.
 
It's not clear to me whether the Pauli Exclusion Principle (even though it might have been originally formulated as such) is only intended to apply to atomic electrons. I don't think that's important though.

More importantly - fermions, any particles (quarks, neutrinos, etc) have spins in multiples of 1/2, do obey Fermi-Dirac statistics, which says that identical fermions cannot be in the same quantum state.

Bosons, of integer spin, do not.
 
Is there any other then bosons that it doesn't work for?
 
Yes,ghost fields are fermionic (described by elements of a \mathbb{Z}_{2} graded Grassmann algebra) integer spin fields...

Daniel.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top