Does the Pauli Exclusion Principle Span Distance?

argonurbawono
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
sometimes i think, would the pauli exclusion principle still apply if the fermions span a very large spatial distance?

for example if i have a very very loooong chain of condensed electrons, wouldn't it be possible that the electrons at both ends occasionaly occupy the same quantum state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Position is part of the description of a quantum state. When electrons are sufficiently separated that their wavefunctions effectively do not overlap, there is no Pauli exclusion for their spin states.
 
i see.

thanks.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top