Does the Pivot Exert a Moment Reaction for Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a pivot exerts a moment reaction for equilibrium. It is established that a pin support does not create a bending moment but can still maintain equilibrium if the moments from forces on either side balance. Conversely, a fixed support does exert a moment, ensuring equilibrium under any load distribution. The conversation highlights the critical condition where the load distribution affects stability, challenging initial intuitions about rotation. Ultimately, understanding the moments on each side is essential for determining the stability of the beam.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
f04rv6.png

I know that the pivot exerts a vertical reaction equal to Cy = w0L / 2 and a horizontal reaction equal to Cx = 0. Does the pivot also exert a moment reaction? My intuition says that it doesn't and that it's actually not in equilibrium because it will rotate about the pivot, but the question is asking for a check of a state of equilibrium. Anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether it is in equilibrium depends on the type of pivot. If it's a pin support, then there is no bending moment in the pivot but the beam could still be in equilibrium if the moment of the resultant force acting on the left side = moment of the resultant force acting on the right.

If it's a fixed support then there is a moment and the beam would always be in equilibirum (nonuniform distribution of moments on the beam will be equilibrated by the moment in the pivot). But then the answer is always yes, so probably that is not the case.

I think here you have a pin support, so the rotation is allowed, but check the moments on each side to see if it will be stable anyway :)
 
Equilibrium worked out after all the math. I have to say that this challenged my intuition because I would think that the beam would start rotating counter-clockwise due to the load on the right of the pivot being larger than the load on the left of the pivot.
 
Yeah, it's not quite intuitive. Here happens to be the critical condition, any more or less load on either side would rotate it. Remember that less force is required on a longer arm and more on the shorter, to produce the same moment :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top