Does the Pivot Exert a Moment Reaction for Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a pivot exerts a moment reaction for equilibrium. It is established that a pin support does not create a bending moment but can still maintain equilibrium if the moments from forces on either side balance. Conversely, a fixed support does exert a moment, ensuring equilibrium under any load distribution. The conversation highlights the critical condition where the load distribution affects stability, challenging initial intuitions about rotation. Ultimately, understanding the moments on each side is essential for determining the stability of the beam.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
f04rv6.png

I know that the pivot exerts a vertical reaction equal to Cy = w0L / 2 and a horizontal reaction equal to Cx = 0. Does the pivot also exert a moment reaction? My intuition says that it doesn't and that it's actually not in equilibrium because it will rotate about the pivot, but the question is asking for a check of a state of equilibrium. Anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether it is in equilibrium depends on the type of pivot. If it's a pin support, then there is no bending moment in the pivot but the beam could still be in equilibrium if the moment of the resultant force acting on the left side = moment of the resultant force acting on the right.

If it's a fixed support then there is a moment and the beam would always be in equilibirum (nonuniform distribution of moments on the beam will be equilibrated by the moment in the pivot). But then the answer is always yes, so probably that is not the case.

I think here you have a pin support, so the rotation is allowed, but check the moments on each side to see if it will be stable anyway :)
 
Equilibrium worked out after all the math. I have to say that this challenged my intuition because I would think that the beam would start rotating counter-clockwise due to the load on the right of the pivot being larger than the load on the left of the pivot.
 
Yeah, it's not quite intuitive. Here happens to be the critical condition, any more or less load on either side would rotate it. Remember that less force is required on a longer arm and more on the shorter, to produce the same moment :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top