Does virtual particle-antiparticle annihilation produce anything?

kdlsw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
My understand is, the virtual particle-antiparticle pairs created under uncertainty principle are not the same as the traditional particle-antiparticle (creates new particle after annihilation), the virtual ones does not produce anything, since they are created from nowhere, which the antiparticle must have exact but opposite (negative) energy as the particle.

Please correct if my understanding is not right. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The virtual particle-antiparticle pairs are understood as fluctuations in vacuum energy - the Feynman diagram shows a photon in and a photon out with the pair in a single loop between them.

The thing about virtual particles is that they are virtual - think of them as steps in a calculation and things should settle down for you. Their presence in the math represents a probability of an interaction.
 
Let's talk for electron and positron...
they create the real photon... you can see the pair of particle antiparticle in analogy to how you see a virtual photon being emitted and reabsorbed .. In the photon's case you have a bosonic propagator which, in the qft formalism, you integrate over all possible momenta. In the case of a photon creating a pair of virtual electron+positron, you deal with is as a fermionic propagator, which has different form, but still the idea is the same. All these correspond to several possible loops which exist in Feynman's diagrams...
All this as an additional comment to Simon's post #2...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top