Does Wrapping Frozen Meat in Fur Really Thaw It Faster?

  • Thread starter Thread starter just...DVL
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Wrapping frozen meat in fur is believed to thaw it faster than using flowing water at 10°C, but this claim is disputed. Critics argue that fur acts as an insulator, potentially slowing the thawing process by keeping cold air close to the meat. Thawing meat in water is widely recognized as a more effective method due to the water's ability to transfer heat more efficiently. The discussion highlights confusion over the mechanics of thawing and the melting points of meat and fat. Overall, the effectiveness of using fur for thawing remains questionable and unsupported by scientific reasoning.
just...DVL
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The fact is, that if you get frozen meat and you have to de-freeze it, you will de-freeze it faster, if you pack it into the fur, than if you get it under flowinf water with temperature 10°C = 52F.. WHY? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried this? It doesn't seem to make any sense. Packing meat in fur should greatly slow down the thawing process not speed it up.
 
Hmm, what is a melting point of meat? or for fat?
 
The melting point of meat shouldn't make any difference because when you thaw meat what you are doing is melting ice not fat or meat.
 
So do you have any idea why is it packed in fur faster?
 
Where did you hear this? I think either you misundertood or someone was fooling you.

Wrapping frozen meat in fur would insulate the meat and hold the cold air next to the meat, causing it to thaw slower than if exposed directly to air, which I am assuming is above freezing. Thawing meat in water is a well known method for thawing meat quickly.

I'm also locking this because you have posted this in more than one forum.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top