Domain and range of composite functions?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the domain and range of the composite function f(g(x)), start by identifying the domain of g(x), as x must be within this range. Next, ensure that the outputs of g(x) fall within the domain of f. The domain of f(g(x)) is thus equivalent to the domain of g(x). For the range, evaluate the outputs of f based on the range of g; if f outputs only positive values, the range of f(g(x)) will be the set of positive real numbers. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately determining the domain and range of composite functions.
CAH
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
hey!
How do you work out the domain and range of fg(x), do you work out what range of g(x) will fit the domain of f(x)?

I have no clue.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey CAH,
Sorry, but do you mean f(g(x)) or f(x) * g(x) ?
 
°
CAH said:
How do you work out the domain and range of fg(x), do you work out what range of g(x) will fit the domain of f(x)?
Based on the thread title, by fg(x) you mean f(g(x)). So you are trying to work out the domain and range for the composition of f with g.

For the range, you would start with the range of the inner function -- g in this case. Figure out what outputs are possible from f when its inputs are in that range.

For the domain, you would start with the domain of the outer function -- f in this case. Figure out what inputs to g can produce outputs in that range.
 
for example:
f(x)=3e^(2x) domain:(-infinity, +infinity)
g(x)=ln(4x) domain:(0, +infinity)

how would i go about finding the domain and range of f(g(x))?

(thanks for the reply)
 
First, to be in the domain of f(g(x)), x must first be in the domain of g. Then it must be true that g(x), for that particular x, is in the domain of f. Here, the domain of f is all real numbers so the domain of f(g(x)) is just the domain of g. As for range, g(x) can give any real number but f of any number is positive so the range of f(g(x)) is the set of positive real numbers.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top