Domain of a function - f(x,y)=root(1-x)+root(1-y)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FOIWATER
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Function
AI Thread Summary
The function f(x,y) = √(1-x) + √(1-y) is defined for x and y values ranging from negative infinity up to and including 1. The discussion explores the domain as a 2D problem in the x-y plane, suggesting that the intersection of the domains for x and y forms a rectangular area. The participants clarify that for real numbers, x and y must be less than or equal to 1 to avoid undefined values under the square root. There is some confusion about visualizing this in three-dimensional space, but the focus remains on the 2D representation. Overall, the domain is confirmed to be the set of real numbers where both x and y are less than or equal to 1.
FOIWATER
Gold Member
Messages
434
Reaction score
12
I have came up with a solution for this - in order for this function to be defined, we must have an x and y between negative infinity up to and including the number 1.

If asked to graph this domain, does the domain lie on the x-y plane of three dimensional space, and is it the intersection of the domains of x and y?

I know the only sensible way to my question will likely go over my head - I Just started vector calculus - so no worries, I find it difficult for this to make sense to me.

I am thinking of the domain as the values "under" the z-plane in 3d space, if that makes any sense... at all - or above! or maybe a point in three-d space is ON the plane, when z is zero?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i think this is simplay a 2D problem in x and y unless you want to make it 3D by stating f(x,y)=z

next what does the root(1-x) mean? I don't understand how to even plot this if I could.
 
well it's 1-x all under a square root sign

root(1-x) = sqrt(1-x)

you know?
 
okay got it so that's why x>1 or y>1 is out of bounds if you're dealing with real numbers but okay for complex numbers.

so I got a sideways parabola from ending at z=0 x=1 y=1

You might google on graph 3D calculator and try your formula. I did but I didnt have the flash plugin installed (I'm on linux) so I had to imagine how it looks rotating the x curve around (1,1,0)
 
really..hmm.. I got a rectangular plane - I don't think we are considering z here? hold it constant, and just focus on y and x right?

so we have x and y have both to be less than or equal to negative one. So they intersect on a rectangular plane going back to negative infinity...?
 
Assuming you are just dealing in real numbers, your domain is simply to do with x and y and it is \{x,y \in\mathbb R: x \leq 1,\ y \leq 1\}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top