Doppler effect and speed of light as a constant.

paalfis
Messages
69
Reaction score
2
The question "If light speed is constant, how do you explain the Doppler Effect?" has been asked a lot in the internet. Anyway, I haven't found one concise answer. In the book Kleppner&Kolenkow Mechanics there is a brief explanation of the Relativistic Doppler Effect, but as usual in this topic, it uses the property of light speed being constant to explain it (it doesn't deduce this last property).
So, the right questions to ask, in my opinion are these:
  • How would you (cleverly) use the red shift property to deduce that light speed is constant?
  • In terms of the properties of light as a wave, what happens to the wave in order to change it's wavelength to red but maintain it's speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You can't. The phenomenon does not depend on lightspeed being invariant (note: not "constant").
"invariant" means that all inertial observers measure the same value.
However, you can compare different models experimentally and show the most useful consistency comes from the invariant lightspeed case.

2. ##c=f\lambda## so what do you think happens to allow the speed to be the same when the wavelength is different?

In considering special relativity, you have to be very careful with your language or you'll get confused.
Forinstance, it is natural to think that a light source gets bluer if you move towards it - but this language is nonsence in SR.
The "you" in the sentence is the observer.
In SR, all observers are stationary.
So how can "you" be "move towards" the light source?

Instead you have to compare two situations.
i.e. two otherwise identical light sources, one stationary wrt you and the other moving towards you, will show a difference in their frequencies: the moving one is bluer. The blueness is a manifestation of the momentum it carries. The speed of the light from each source can be measured and will be found to be the same.

And that is the succinct description for how the doppler shift happens when the speed of light is invarient.

You should realize that the invariance of the speed of light is not a deduced property, but a postulated one. It is needed in order to make a definition of what we mean by "simultaneous events".
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top