Doppler Effect on Light: Understanding Red and Blue Shifts in Galaxies

mach990
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new to these forums. I just had a question about the Doppler effect on light (red and blue shifts of light). I've read how it is supposed to work, but I also read in a book that the speed of light is constant in all moving frames.

So if you've got a galaxy moving towards you, and it's throwing out photons towards you, all of which traveling at c, shouldn't there be no doppler effect because relative to one another, they're all traveling 186,000 miles a second, and would all reach you at the same time anyways? The analogy in the book (I think it was Hyperspace by Michio Kaku) said something about cars traveling at 99% the speed of light, and a train traveling at the speed of light, but to the car it would seem the train is still speeding ahead at 100% the speed of light, and not 1% the speed of light...

OR is it simply that if they're both going the speed of light, the effect can apply?

Bear with me, I am probably missing something obvious or just plain not understanding :biggrin:

Thanks for any replies. (And I hope this was the right category to put this in!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From what I understand.

If you're in a vehicle traveling very close to the speed of light, time inside the vehicle will go normally, but outside the vehicle time will be slowed down, from an observer inside the vehicle.

I would love for someone that knows a bit more about this to give a proper explanation, I'm very confused as well hehe.
 
Hi there,

The Doppler effect as nothing to do with the speed of light contanst. It simply says that if you are moving toward a light source, the frequency of the light will increase.

Whether the light is blue, red or purple, it all travels at the speed of light. The only difference is the distance between two peaks. As a matter of fact, the only difference between radio wave, micro wave, visible light, X-rays/gamma-rays lies in this distance between peaks.

Cheers
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top