Doppler Effect (Proving equal wavelengths )

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the wavelength perceived by an observer is equal to the wavelength of the emitted wave in the context of the Doppler Effect. The emitted wavelength is expressed as v/f, while the perceived wavelength is given as (u + v)/f(1 + u/v). A participant explains that by transforming the perceived wavelength expression using a common denominator, the terms can be simplified, leading to the cancellation of (u + v) in the numerator. This simplification ultimately shows that both wavelengths are indeed equal. The conversation highlights the mathematical manipulation necessary to understand this aspect of the Doppler Effect.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am doing doppler effect and this question wants me to prove that the wavelength perceived by the observer and that of the wave emitted is the same.

I tried doing it but couldn't, so I checked out what they had as an answer:

They said that the wavelength of the emitted wave is: v / f, which I agree with

They said the perceived wavelength is equal to: u + v / f (1 + u/v), which I also agree with.

Now, how they proved that those are equal I don't understand... I tried but I just can't see it. Can anyone help me with the steps involved?

Thanks,
Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter G. said:
Hi,

I am doing doppler effect and this question wants me to prove that the wavelength perceived by the observer and that of the wave emitted is the same.

I tried doing it but couldn't, so I checked out what they had as an answer:

They said that the wavelength of the emitted wave is: v / f, which I agree with

They said the perceived wavelength is equal to: u + v / f (1 + u/v), which I also agree with.

Now, how they proved that those are equal I don't understand... I tried but I just can't see it. Can anyone help me with the steps involved?

Thanks,
Peter

it is just transformation of the expression, using common denominator.

(1 + u/v) = (v/v + u/v) = (v + u)/v = (u + v)/v [I reversed the v+u so it was identical to the numerator]

Put that in the expression and the (u + v) terms cancel, and the v ends up in the numerator to give v/f
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top