B Dot product scalar distributivity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dot product scalar distributivity, specifically the expression (\alpha\vec{a})\cdot b and its relation to \alpha(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}). A participant questions whether it should be |\alpha|(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}) due to the norm of the scalar multiplication. The response clarifies that the angle \theta between the vectors changes with the scalar, particularly when \alpha is negative, affecting the dot product outcome. The conclusion emphasizes that the assumption about the angle being the same is incorrect, and thus the original expression holds true. Understanding the geometric implications of scalar multiplication on angles is crucial in this context.
archaic
Messages
688
Reaction score
214
I'm having a little trouble with this :
We have ##(\alpha\vec{a})\cdot b = \alpha(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})## but shouldn't it be ##|\alpha|(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})## instead since ##||\alpha \vec{a}||=|\alpha|.||\vec{a}||## ?

##(\alpha\vec{a})\cdot b = ||\alpha\vec{a}||.||\vec{b}||.\cos\theta = |\alpha|.||\vec{a}||.||\vec{b}||.\cos\theta = |\alpha|(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})##
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
archaic said:
I'm having a little trouble with this :
We have ##(\alpha\vec{a})\cdot b = \alpha(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})## but shouldn't it be ##|\alpha|(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})## instead since ##||\alpha \vec{a}||=|\alpha|.||\vec{a}||## ?

##(\alpha\vec{a})\cdot b = ||\alpha\vec{a}||.||\vec{b}||.\cos\theta = |\alpha|.||\vec{a}||.||\vec{b}||.\cos\theta = |\alpha|(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})##

Clearly ##(-\vec{a})\cdot b = -(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})##

Where you have gone wrong is assuming that ##\theta## is the same angle between vectors ##\vec{a}, \vec{b}## and ##\alpha \vec{a}, \vec{b}##. If you draw a diagram for 2D vectors with ##\alpha = -1## you'll see that this changes the angle.
 
  • Like
Likes archaic
PeroK said:
Clearly ##(-\vec{a})\cdot b = -(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b})##

Where you have gone wrong is assuming that ##\theta## is the same angle between vectors ##\vec{a}, \vec{b}## and ##\alpha \vec{a}, \vec{b}##. If you draw a diagram for 2D vectors with ##\alpha = -1## you'll see that this changes the angle.
Right, thank you!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top