Double Counting Correction in LDA+U: AMF vs. FLL

PascalM
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm not sure if someone here can help me because the topic is quite specific.
In LDA+U Calculation one have to substract the Double Counting from the DFT functional. There are two main possibilities to do this:
1.) Around Mean Field (AMF)
2.) Fully Localized Limit (FLL)

I found out, that there's a correction term to FLL due to non-collinearity and I ask myself if there's a correction term to AMF aswell. I searched in books, papers and the internet but didn't find anything about this topic.

Maybe someone can help me.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PascalM said:
to substract the Double Counting from the DFT functional.

When you say subtract double counting, do you mean correcting the one electron self-interaction?
 
Hi,

yes i mean the correction of the one electron self-interaction. Sorry for that mad formulation!
I found a paper (Physical Review B 67, 153106 (2003)) where the author wrote down the correction in terms of density matrices. But if I try to evaluate these formula for FLL DC (where I know the exact result, i.e. given in http://ftp.abinit.org/ws11/bousquet.pdf), I do not get the right double-counting correction.

I will go on working on this problem today.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top