Programs Double major in aerospace engineering and physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges of pursuing a double major in applied physics and aerospace engineering. The original poster expresses frustration with course availability and outlines a plan to graduate in four years while taking 18 credits each semester. They are open to extending their studies into a fifth year if necessary and are determined to avoid a six-year timeline. Participants share their experiences with heavy course loads, emphasizing that while it is demanding, it is feasible with commitment. They advise seeking research opportunities to strengthen graduate school applications and suggest considering summer courses to lighten the load during regular semesters. Some contributors recommend that taking longer to graduate may lead to better academic performance, suggesting that focusing on a single degree with a minor might be more beneficial than a double major. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of balancing course loads, academic goals, and practical experience in the field.
yeezyseason3
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I understand that this question has already been asked but I am still not satisfied with the answers given. My original plan was to do applied physics with a specialty in astrodynamics and propulsion with a minor in astronomy. Unfortunately most of the classes with in the aero department were closed off and in order for me to register I had to wait until open registration and by then the classes would've all filled up. I decided that because I want to primarily get a physics degree but work in aerospace I could do a double major. My plan of study has me graduating in four years right now but that requires me taking 18 credits for the rest of my existence (including the senior design). My plan now is to follow the plan I made and take it semester by semester. If I have to drop a class I will just push it into a fifth year. I will not take 6 years and if it seems like that may be the case before I get to my fifth year I'll drop the aerospace engineering degree completely and just come out with an applied physics degree. To fellow aerospace students, how feasible is 18 credits of pure aero engineering and physics classes? Also to those who have done it please leave a reply on how well you did as well as how difficult it actually is. What I want to do with both, I have an elaborate plan which involves going to graduate school with a professor who I know works in the field and that requires both deep knowledge of quantum field theory as well as advanced fluid dynamics which are both upper division courses in physics and aerospace engineering respectively.
 
I'm doing something similar, physics and math double major. I front loaded my GEs so now I'm just doing all physics and math courses (18 to 20 units per quarter). It's time consuming and tiring but possible if you're committed. You should be able to get good grades if, like I said, you're committed

Also, make sure you try to get some research experience for grad school. Oh, and if possible take courses during the summer to alleviate your load during any given quarter/semester.

I'm not sure about your specific school but most schools have quantum field theory as a grad level topic. So, if you're trying to do this that'll most likely mean you'll have to finish the core undergrad curriculum early and move on to the grad courses or learn it via independent study with a professor
 
  • Like
Likes yeezyseason3
Brian T said:
I'm doing something similar, physics and math double major. I front loaded my GEs so now I'm just doing all physics and math courses (18 to 20 units per quarter). It's time consuming and tiring but possible if you're committed. You should be able to get good grades if, like I said, you're committed

Also, make sure you try to get some research experience for grad school. Oh, and if possible take courses during the summer to alleviate your load during any given quarter/semester.

I'm not sure about your specific school but most schools have quantum field theory as a grad level topic. So, if you're trying to do this that'll most likely mean you'll have to finish the core undergrad curriculum early and move on to the grad courses or learn it via independent study with a professor

I am going to push myself and do it. You are right I am probably going to end up taking QFT as an elective in grad school. I'm just focused on graduating in four years right now. Thanks for the non-negative "oh you won't be able to handle it" post.
 
yeezyseason3 said:
I understand that this question has already been asked but I am still not satisfied with the answers given. My original plan was to do applied physics with a specialty in astrodynamics and propulsion with a minor in astronomy. Unfortunately most of the classes with in the aero department were closed off and in order for me to register I had to wait until open registration and by then the classes would've all filled up. I decided that because I want to primarily get a physics degree but work in aerospace I could do a double major. My plan of study has me graduating in four years right now but that requires me taking 18 credits for the rest of my existence (including the senior design). My plan now is to follow the plan I made and take it semester by semester. If I have to drop a class I will just push it into a fifth year. I will not take 6 years and if it seems like that may be the case before I get to my fifth year I'll drop the aerospace engineering degree completely and just come out with an applied physics degree. To fellow aerospace students, how feasible is 18 credits of pure aero engineering and physics classes? Also to those who have done it please leave a reply on how well you did as well as how difficult it actually is. What I want to do with both, I have an elaborate plan which involves going to graduate school with a professor who I know works in the field and that requires both deep knowledge of quantum field theory as well as advanced fluid dynamics which are both upper division courses in physics and aerospace engineering respectively.

Take more then 4 years to graduate, 5 or even 6 years is reasonable given a double major with as many classes as physics and aerospace engineering. It's better to take longer and do well in your classes than be rushed to finish in the 'normal' time span and get mediocre grades because you couldn't focus enough on anyone class. I did a double major in physics and electrical engineering and my advice to most is don't do that unless your program integrates that into a major like applied/engineering physics. If I were you I would just stick to the applied physics degree and minor in aerospace engineering or vice versa; since you want to do astrodynamics anyway why don't you seek out a professor doing research in said area and do research/project work in that; that's going to look better than a giant slew of classes just so you can have the name recognition of engineering on your diploma.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Back
Top