Central Maximum Shift Due to Glass Slit in Double Slit Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathIsFun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
AI Thread Summary
Light of wavelength 600 nm passing through two slits separated by 0.20 mm experiences a central maximum shift when a thin piece of glass delays one wave by 5.0 × 10−16 seconds. The initial phase delay calculated is π/2, requiring an additional distance of λ/4 for constructive interference. The distance traveled by light through the glass slit is expressed in terms of the screen distance and the position of the slits. A simpler approach to find the shift, h, is to use the relationship λ/4 = d sin θ. This method simplifies the calculation without the need for computational tools.
MathIsFun

Homework Statement



Light of wavelength 600 nm passes though two slits separated by 0.20 mm and is observed on a screen 1.5 m behind the slits. The location of the central maximum is marked on the screen and labeled y = 0.

A very thin piece of glass is then placed in one slit. Because light travels slower in glass than in air, the wave passing through the glass is delayed by 5.0 ×10−16s in comparison to the wave going through the other slit.

Part E

By how far does the central maximum move?

Homework Equations



\Delta \phi=2\pi m

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated that the initial phase delay due to the glass is \frac{\pi}{2}. So in order to have constructive interference, the light wave that travels through the slit with no glass must travel an additional distance of \frac{\lambda}{4}. I called the distance that the light through the glass travels x_{1} and the distance that the light through the normal slit travels x_{2}. I know that x_{1}=\sqrt{L^{2}+(\frac{d}{2}-h)^{2}} and x_{2}=\sqrt{L^{2}+(\frac{d}{2}+h)^{2}}So then I have \sqrt{L^{2}+(\frac{d}{2}+h)^{2}}-\sqrt{L^{2}+(\frac{d}{2}-h)^{2}}=\frac{\lambda}{4}
I don't know how to solve this analytically, so I plugged it into Wolfram Alpha and got h\approx 0.00113 meters, which is correct, but I feel that there should be another way to solve for h that doesn't require a computer algebra system.

Is there another way to approach this problem that makes finding h simpler?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would expand each radical in Taylor series. You can write the radicals as ##L\sqrt{1+\epsilon_{\pm}^2}## where ##\epsilon_{\pm}=\frac{d/2 \pm h}{L}## and expand about zero for small values of ##\epsilon_{\pm}##.

On edit: I just did it and the answer is very simple.
 
  • Like
Likes MathIsFun
Yes, I can see how that works now.

Thank you for your help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top