Double slit experiment with smoke particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the fringe separation in a double slit experiment using smoke particles with a wavelength of 6.6e-20 meters. Participants express confusion about applying the formula 2dsin(theta) = n(lambda) to find the angle theta and the fringe separation. Clarifications are provided regarding the terms in the formula, including the significance of slit width and the number of maxima. The conversation emphasizes the need to understand de Broglie wavelength and its relation to particle momentum. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of applying wave optics principles to particle behavior in the double slit experiment.
DODGEVIPER13
Messages
668
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose we wish to do a double slit experiment with a beam of the smoke particles of Example 4.1c (which is lamda=6.6e-20m). Assume we can construct a double slit whose separation is about the same size of the particles. Estimate the separation between the fringes if the double slit and the screen were on opposite coasts of the United States.


Homework Equations


2dsin(theta)=n(lamda)
lamda=h/p


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I see how they got lamda and I understand that I am looking for the separation between the fringes. And that the separation between the slits is 6.6e-20 meters. Honestly I would show work if I understood what was happening here but I am confused. I am confused on how to find theta or un less I assume n=1 but I still don't know lamda.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DODGEVIPER13 said:
I still don't know lamda.
:smile: I believe you wrote ...
(which is lamda=6.6e-20m)[/size]

It seems this question is about the de Broglie wavelength associated with particles and their momentum.
 
Yah sorry and you are correct it is de broglies wavelength but how should I start this?
 
Can you explain the terms in this formula you provided?
2. Homework Equations
2dsin(theta)=n(lamda)
 
D is slit width is the angl found from the incident beam, the 2 comes from the distance from the second level of atoms and n stands for the number of maximums and finally lambda stands for the wavelength
 
DODGEVIPER13 said:
D is slit width is the angl found from the incident beam, the 2 comes from the distance from the second level of atoms and n stands for the number of maximums and finally lambda stands for the wavelength
You sound a little confused. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
The formula for maxima in the bands is explained under Classical wave-optics formulation
The formula enables you to find sinθ, the apex angle of a long thin triangle of height equalling the width of north America.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top