Doubt about Bhabha scattering.

  • Thread starter Thread starter arroy_0205
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Scattering
arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
I have one doubt about Bhabha scattering which is scattering between one electron and one positron, two oppositely charged particles. Why should they scatter each other away rather than attract and eventually annihilate themselves, giving rise to the pair annihilation process? (This process is dealth with in for example, Peskin-Scroeder's book on QFT). But I do not understand when they would annihilate and when they would scatter each other. Both are described in QED, by exchange of photon. But in one case there is attraction in the other, there is repulsion. How is that possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arroy_0205 said:
I have one doubt about Bhabha scattering which is scattering between one electron and one positron, two oppositely charged particles. Why should they scatter each other away rather than attract and eventually annihilate themselves, giving rise to the pair annihilation process? (This process is dealth with in for example, Peskin-Scroeder's book on QFT). But I do not understand when they would annihilate and when they would scatter each other. Both are described in QED, by exchange of photon. But in one case there is attraction in the other, there is repulsion. How is that possible?

Firstly, let's make one thing clear: e- and e+ always "attract" each other for they carry opposite charge. A system with an e- and e+ is basically the positronium. "scattering" is just a term to say there is an interaction. Now from QED, there are two possible diagrams that contribute to this (ie. two diagrams with the same initial and final states): one is what you call the annihilation diagram and the other one is the "direct"/"standard" one (strictly speaking you can call it what you want). So when you wish to work out the amplitude/cross-section for this interaction, QED is telling you that there are two ways via which this can happen so you need to consider them both to get the total rate. Namely, e- and e+ go close to each other an interact via a virtual photon or they annihilate each other first then reappear again. NB: you final states e- and e+ will still be attracted to each other via the electromagnetic force. So interpreting that there is a repulsion may be a bit misleading for the "direct" case.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
134
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
7K
Back
Top