Doubt on Depletion Layer Width in Biased pn-Jnction

AI Thread Summary
The depletion layer in a biased pn-junction diode consists of immobile ions from p-type and n-type dopants, which do not move during biasing. When a diode is biased, the width of the depletion layer changes due to the redistribution of mobile charge carriers, not the movement of the ions themselves. The ions remain fixed in the semiconductor lattice, maintaining the depletion zone as an insulator. This behavior contrasts with metals, where mobile electrons can be removed, significantly affecting conductivity. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for semiconductor device operation and design.
Himabindu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
" Depletion Layer is the region in diode which consists of ions( formed due to formation of octet configuration )of p-type and n-type dopants"
What happens to the ions present in the depletion layer when a diode is biased?
why the depletion layer width changes??
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Himabindu said:
" Depletion Layer is the region in diode which consists of ions( formed due to formation of octet configuration )of p-type and n-type dopants"
What happens to the ions present in the depletion layer when a diode is biased?
why the depletion layer width changes??

Ions are part of the semiconductor crystal lattice. They were placed there during the doping process. They're supposed to not move during biasing. (If the ions move around, it means that your doping profile is diffusing, and the characteristics of your diode/transistor/etc. are being altered.)

Remember that 'insulator' basically means 'a material lacking mobile charge carriers.' The depletion zone is a fair insulator because those ions aren't mobile.

Analogous situation: Metals are composed of a crystalline grid of positive ions immersed in a "sea" of mobile electrons. If it was possible to sweep all the electrons out of a piece of copper, then the copper would become insulating, and we would have all-metal transistors. But now go and estimate the range of potential needed to remove all electrons from even a very thin film of copper. But while copper contains ~1 mobile electron per atom, doped semiconductor contains ~10^-9 mobile charge carrier per atom (or even less for lighter doping.) Thus the required potentials are many, many orders smaller for semiconductor switching, when compared to those required for metals. That's why it's possible to sweep the carriers out of a region of doped silicon, but it's not really feasible to do the same with a metal.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top