Doubt related to the velocity of the center of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the velocity and acceleration of the center of mass (CoM) in systems with no external forces. It is clarified that the formula for the center of mass velocity, V_cm = (m1*v1 + m2*v2)/(m1 + m2), can be applied regardless of whether the CoM was initially at rest, as long as it is derived from the position equation. The participants agree that the CoM can only move with a non-zero velocity if it was initially moving, but the acceleration of the CoM can still be determined using the correct masses and accelerations. The key takeaway is that the equations for V_cm and A_cm are valid under specific conditions, and the assumption of equal accelerations can lead to misunderstandings. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurately applying the concepts of center of mass in physics.
Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
1. if two bodies of masses m are moving toward each other with a constant speed v and 2v find the speed of the CoM.
2. If two bodies of masses m are accelerating towards each other due to the force of gravity on each of them what is the speed of the CoM.
Relevant Equations
$$V_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$
In question 1. since there is no external force on the system of particles(and since it was initially at rest) shouldn't the ##V_{cm}## be zero?
But the correct answer applies the above stated formula for ##V_{cm}## and gets ##V_{cm} = v/2##

and in question 2 again as there is no external force on the system the ##V_{cm} = 0## (as they will also collide at the CoM) but here how exactly can you apply the above formula(maybe in a differential eqn form as they are accelerating) to get ##V_{cm} = 0##

in short I am confused as to when to apply $$V_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
since it was initially at rest
Who says?
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
how exactly can you apply the above formula(maybe in a differential eqn form as they are accelerating)
The formula has velocities, you want accelerations.
How do you get from a velocity to an acceleration?
 
haruspex said:
Who says?
so the CoM of a system can move with a velocity only if it was initially moving (and ##F_{ext} = 0##)
is this reasoning correct?

also, in the second scenario since the CoM wasn't initially moving and there is no external force hence it should remain at rest. but here if $$A_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}a_{1} + m_{2}a_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$ won't you get a wrong answer as ##A_{cm}## should equal zero o_O
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
so the CoM of a system can move with a velocity only if it was initially moving (and Fext=0)
is this reasoning correct?
Yes.
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
wont you get a wrong answer as Acm should equal zero
So what do you need to prove regarding ##m_1a_1+m_2a_2## in this scenario?
 
haruspex said:
Yes.

So what do you need to prove regarding ##m_1a_1+m_2a_2## in this scenario?
in this scenario since their masses are equal and their accelerations are in the opposite direction ##m_1a_1+m_2a_2 = 0##
but if their masses were say ##m## and ##2m## then the CoM will have a non zero acceleration
(as ##(2ma-ma)/(3m) = a/3)## but again ##F_{ext} = 0## and hence shouldn't ##A_{cm}## equal zero?
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
in this scenario since their masses are equal and their accelerations are in the opposite direction ##m_1a_1+m_2a_2 = 0##
Yes.
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
but if their masses were say ##m## and ##2m## then the CoM will have a non zero acceleration
(as ##(2ma-ma)/(3m) = a/3)## but again ##F_{ext} = 0## and hence shouldn't ##A_{cm}## equal zero?
You've assumed here that the accelerations of the two masses are equal -- that both are given by the same variable named ##a##. But is that assumption correct?
 
jbriggs444 said:
Yes.

You've assumed here that the accelerations of the two masses are equal -- that both are given by the same variable named ##a##. But is that assumption correct?
I get my mistake now.
so the equation $$A_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}a_{1} + m_{2}a_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$ is always valid and $$V_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$ can be used only if ##F_{ext} = 0## and the center of mass is initially in motion.
 
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
I get my mistake now.
so the equation $$A_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}a_{1} + m_{2}a_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$ is always valid
Yes, this is correct. This equation can be derived by differentiating the one below.
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
$$V_{cm} = \frac {m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$ can be used only if ##F_{ext} = 0## and the center of mass is initially in motion.
No. This equation holds always. It can be derived by differentiating the equation I provide here:$$X_{cm}=\frac{m_1x_1 + m_2x_2}{m_1 + m_2}$$This equation holds always. It is the definition of the position (##X##) of the center of mass.

Your error is the one that I pointed out, the fallacy of equivocation. You used one variable to denote two accelerations which were not necessarily equal.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
Back
Top