Downsizing motor that drive fans

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ming1992
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Motor
AI Thread Summary
Downsizing the motor driving a fan can potentially reduce power consumption, but it requires careful consideration of the desired airflow and fan specifications. Simply using a smaller motor does not guarantee a lower RPM, as RPM is not directly tied to motor size but rather to the motor design and application. If the fan is belt-driven, resizing the pulleys can also help achieve the desired RPM. It's essential to determine the required volumetric flow rate and consult the fan curve to identify the minimum horsepower needed for effective operation. A variable frequency drive (VFD) may also be a viable solution for controlling motor speed without relying on dampers.
Ming1992
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am facing some problem

can i just downsize the motor that drive the fan as currently the fan is operated at full load but the flow rate is controlled by a damper.
my thought is that is it possible to downsize the motor so it will operate at lower rpm therefore we no longer need to use damper to control the airflow.

the implication to it is to lower down power consumption of the motor.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Use a VFD?
 
Rpm isn't a function of size for most AC motors, but you can select from several typical RPMs.

If the fan is belt driven, you could also resize the pulleys.
 
Using a smaller motor won't necessarily mean a lower rpm: it means less horse power. If you want to use a smaller motor, you must first determine your desired volumetric flow rate, and then look at the fan curve for that particular fan to see what minimal motor horse power you need.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top