Drag racing acceleration and friction

AI Thread Summary
In drag racing, acceleration is limited by tire friction, described by the equation a = μ_sg, where μ_s is static friction and g is gravity. This expression for acceleration is derived from the relationship between frictional force and mass, where the mass cancels out, making acceleration independent of the car's mass. As mass increases, both the normal force and frictional force increase, but so does inertia, which complicates acceleration. The discussion highlights that tire grip is influenced by the normal force, making the relationship between acceleration and friction more complex. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing drag racing performance.
andro
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In a drag race starting from rest, assume we have constant acceleration and the acceleration is limited by tire friction. I understand we have ##v(t) = at## and I have read elsewhere on this forum that ##a = \mu_sg## where ##\mu_s## is the static friction involved, and ##g## is the acceleration due to gravity.

But how is this expression for ##a## derived? How is it independent of the mass of the car?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andro said:
In a drag race starting from rest, assume we have constant acceleration and the acceleration is limited by tire friction. I understand we have ##v(t) = at## and I have read elsewhere on this forum that ##a = \mu_sg## where ##\mu_s## is the static friction involved, and ##g## is the acceleration due to gravity.

But how is this expression for ##a## derived? How is it independent of the mass of the car?

The frictional force is given by

F_friction = mu * mass * g

If the acceleration is limited by the Friction, as you have stated, then

mass * a <= mu * mass * g

Mass cancels.

As the mass of the car increases, the Normal force increases, as does the Frictional force. But as the mass increases, the inertia increases, as well -- the car is harder to accelerate.

You see the same thing (somewhat counterintuitive) with the speed of falling objects. As the mass of an object increases, the weight (force pulling down) increases. But as the mass increases, so does the inertia (resistance to acceleration). Since both weight and inertia are proportional to mass, the acceleration of falling bodies is independent of their mass.
 
where did you find that problem?. I think it is difficult to solve. The friction created by the tire is a not so simple function of the normal force acting on the tire itself. Even the acceleration is a strong function of the normal force since it rule the grip of the tire.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top