Draw Minkowski Diagram: x-axis 0-5m, ct-axis 0-5m

AI Thread Summary
A Minkowski space-time diagram is to be drawn with x- and ct-axes spanning from 0 to 5m, incorporating the primed axes x' and ct'. The transformation formulas x' = gamma(x - vt) and t' = gamma(t - (vx/c^2)) are used to relate the coordinates in different frames. Calibration of the primed axes can be achieved through Lorentz transformations or by recognizing that x² - (ct)² = 1 describes a hyperbola, which remains invariant across frames. The discussion also mentions using triangles of equal area related to the light cone for a simpler construction. Overall, the focus is on accurately representing the space-time relationships in the diagram.
Pixter
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
draw a minkowski space-time diagram for s and s' showing x- and ctaxis as well ass the x'- and ct'-axis. the x-axis and ct axis will span from 0-5m. everwhere x'-axis ct'=0 and likewise for ct'-axis x'=0. [(v=0.6c)(t=t'=0, x=x'=0)]

so any way I start out with drawing ct and x. like a normal x&y diagram.

Then i have the formulas x'=gamma(x-vt)
t'=gamma(t-(vx/c^2))

gamma= yeah you know. =)

oki so i can get ct' by using the formula tan(theta) = c/v

then i can get x' by taking 45(angle for c)-[(tan^-1(c/v))-45(angle for c)]
.

okey i done that. now i have to calibrate the x'- and ct'-axis by using the relations x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1..

now how do I do that? and did I do it correctly in the first part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you did part 1 correctly. Not too sure about how you calculated the angle for x', but it should be the same(from the x axis) as the angle for ct' (from the ct axis), and this one you got alright.

As for the calibration, you can do it using the lorentz transforms, which also work with intervals
\Delta x'=\gamma(\Delta x-v \Delta t)

But to calibrate the x' axis, find \Delta x' for \Delta t=0.

By a similar reasoning, you can find \Delta ct' for a ct interval of 1 in the stationary frame.

You can of course also use the invariant. \Delta x^2- \Delta ct^2=1 describes a hyperbola on the minkowski diagram, and this value is the same in all frames of reference, so you can just "read" off any axis.
 

Attachments

  • minkowski.jpg
    minkowski.jpg
    11.2 KB · Views: 568
Last edited:
Pixter said:
draw a minkowski space-time diagram for s and s' showing x- and ctaxis as well ass the x'- and ct'-axis. the x-axis and ct axis will span from 0-5m. everwhere x'-axis ct'=0 and likewise for ct'-axis x'=0. [(v=0.6c)(t=t'=0, x=x'=0)]
so any way I start out with drawing ct and x. like a normal x&y diagram.
Then i have the formulas x'=gamma(x-vt)
t'=gamma(t-(vx/c^2))
gamma= yeah you know. =)
oki so i can get ct' by using the formula tan(theta) = c/v
then i can get x' by taking 45(angle for c)-[(tan^-1(c/v))-45(angle for c)]
.
okey i done that. now i have to calibrate the x'- and ct'-axis by using the relations x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1..
now how do I do that? and did I do it correctly in the first part?
Great question... about calibrating the primed-axes. [What text are you using? If solutions are later given, I'd be curious to know how it was solved.]


As SN1987a said, you could use the Lorentz transformations explicitly or recognize that x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1 is a hyperbola.
There is a conceptually simpler construction using triangles of equal area with sides parallel to the light cone. (This has connections to the Bondi k-calculus and the Lorentz transformations in light-cone coordinates.)


See these references:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0407022 Brill and Jacobson
http://www.aip.de/~lie/GEOMETRIE/GeomZeit.html Liebscher
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411069 Mermin
http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/~cew2/P209/P209_home.html Mermin notes
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0505134 mine
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top