Drive line inertia and torsional effects exam question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating inertial forces in gears and the relationships between torque and angular acceleration for connected shafts. It presents equations for torque and angular relationships, leading to a system of seven equations with seven unknowns. The approach suggested involves selecting an arbitrary rotation rate for one shaft, calculating the rotational kinetic energy (KE) for each shaft, and determining the effective moment of inertia for shafts B and C based on these KE values. An example calculation illustrates how to derive the effective moment of inertia for shaft B. The overall goal is to find the total effective moment of inertia for the system by summing the individual moments of inertia.
Alistair McCheyne
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
upload_2016-5-7_13-44-52.png

Hi can anyone help me with this question on inertial forces in gears?
Cheers
Ali :)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-5-7_13-44-7.png
    upload_2016-5-7_13-44-7.png
    51.2 KB · Views: 613
Engineering news on Phys.org
For every shaft i, you get:
\sum T_i = I_i \alpha_i
And for every gear i connected to gear j, you get:
\frac{T_{i\ out}}{T_{j\ in}} = \frac{N_i}{N_j}
\frac{\alpha_i}{\alpha_j} = \frac{N_j}{N_i}

This gives you 7 equations with 7 unknowns (T_{A\ out}, T_{B\ in}, T_{B\ out}, T_{C\ in}, \alpha_A, \alpha_B, \alpha_C).
 
i would be tempted to apportion an effective moment of inertia to shafts B & C (this takes into account the relative rotation rates)

Select an arbitrary rotation rate for shaft A (say 10 rad/sec)
Calculate the rotational KE of each shaft at this rate
The effective moment of inertia of shafts B and C you calculate by comparing the KE values to that of shaft A
For example :
The KE of shaft A at 10 rad / sec = 75 joules
The KE of shaft B at 5 rad / sec = 0.625 joules, so its effective moment of inertia = 1.5 * ( 0.625 / 75 ) = 0.0125 kg . m^2
Repeat for shaft C then add A, B and C for total effective moment of inertia of the system
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top