Does Dropping an Object Increase the Force It Exerts on the Ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ag048744
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
Weight is defined as the force of gravity acting on an object, which creates a normal force when the object is at rest on a surface. When an object is dropped, it accelerates due to gravity until it reaches terminal velocity, where the force of gravity is balanced by air resistance. Upon impact, an impulsive force occurs, which is significantly greater than the weight of the object at rest, as it involves a rapid change in momentum. This impulsive force is temporary and results from the object's velocity just before impact. Ultimately, once the object settles, the forces return to being balanced, similar to the initial scenario.
ag048744
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
I have always known that weight is the force of gravity. Yet I have always been confused about one thing. If you hold up an object of mass and drop it, won't the ground experience a force that is greater than when the object just sits there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes' temporarily, but the force between the object and the ground is a contact force which has nothing to do with weight or gravity. You get a similar force whenever you lean against a wall, in which case the contact force isn't even vertical and clearly unrelated to your weight.
 
When the object just sits there on the surface of the Earth the force experienced by object onto the earth, and the Earth onto the object is equal and opposite in direction and it depends on the objects distance from the centre of the earth. The force of gravity causes the object to exert a force onto the earth, the Earth exerts an equal force opposite in direction on the object called the normal force. These two forces are balanced, therefore there is no net force, resulting in no acceleration.

When you set something into free fall from a certain height, it will accelerate toward the Earth based on the force of gravity and given enough time will reach terminal velocity due to drag, because the force of gravity will be balanced by the drag of the air on the object causing it to stop accelerating. When the object finally hits the earth, the force exerted temporarily onto the earth, will also be exerted by the Earth on the object, and will be based on the objects change of momentum required to provide the reverse acceleration settling it onto the surface of the earth. This force is called the impulsive force, a large force which occurs during collisions over a small period of time. After this impulsive force settles the object onto the Earth and ceases it from further accelerating, we return to the scenario in the first paragraph.

TLDR: Yes and the reason that the force experienced is greater on impact is because if the object was 1kg and traveling at 20 m/s, a force of 20 N will be exerted on it, in say one second, to bring it to 0 m/s. While just on the ground the object exerts a force of 9.8 N. This is the basic idea and my understanding of it.
 
Last edited:
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top