The Mystery of Free Electron Theory

In summary, the free electron picture is only an approximation and doesn't take into account how close the boundary is to the electrons. The theory neglects the effect of a large boundary potential on the interior electrons.
  • #1
photon79
60
0
In free electron theory, electron doesn't feel any potential due to ions r co-electronsm they r totally free..then why don't they fly off from the metal boundaries?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
photon79 said:
In free electron theory, electron doesn't feel any potential due to ions r co-electronsm they r totally free..then why don't they fly off from the metal boundaries?

Because:

1. Free electron picture is only an approximation.

2. "Free electron" doesn't necessarily mean V=0, but rather V = constant with the boundary very, very far away.

Zz.
 
  • #3
In addition (whether it's the Drude model or any of the more sophisticated models that followed), the theory tends to not venture into what happens near sample boundaries. Things often get too complicated to calculate easily when you are near a boundary.

A little further down in your study, you'll see the the idea of a sample boundary is conveniently done away with by imposing a (periodic) boundary condition that treats the sample as if it were devoid of boundaries.

Coming back to original question, the reason that the electron doesn't fly off the boundary can be separately explained in terms of a large boundary potential, known as the work function. However, the theory does not worry about the effect of this potential on the interior electrons, as they are sufficiently far away from it. The number of electrons "near" the surface, at any point of time is neglected with respect to the total number of electrons. This is not a bad approximation to make.
 
  • #4
Gokul43201 said:
A little further down in your study, you'll see the the idea of a sample boundary is conveniently done away with by imposing a (periodic) boundary condition that treats the sample as if it were devoid of boundaries.

Coming back to original question, the reason that the electron doesn't fly off the boundary can be separately explained in terms of a large boundary potential, known as the work function. However, the theory does not worry about the effect of this potential on the interior electrons, as they are sufficiently far away from it. The number of electrons "near" the surface, at any point of time is neglected with respect to the total number of electrons. This is not a bad approximation to make.

Born and von Karmann thought of this in an astonishing way (conditions for which wave function of the electron is a Bloch electron)... They also understood how to complete the Debye adjustment to the Einstein model for specific heat of a lattice at any temperature (as well as it lies beneath melting point)!
Born-von Karmann boundary conditions hold near always... let be enough boundary particles are very little compared with bulk ones:
in a fraction of mole of matter you have 10^21 circa lattice sites. Think if you have a simple cubic package... Trust in me... you'll find a so vanishing percent of atom on the surface then you feel embarrassment!
armando:tongue:
 
  • #5
A little off topic, doesn't the basis of thermionic emission involve electrons hopping off the boundaries when the material is heated ?

Modey3
 
  • #6
Modey3 said:
A little off topic, doesn't the basis of thermionic emission involve electrons hopping off the boundaries when the material is heated ?

Modey3

Not exactly sure what you mean by "hopping off the boundaries", but thermionic emission is essentially electrons tunneling off the metal across the work function barrier. It is similar to field emission, but due to the large spread in the Fermi function at very high temperature, the electrons has an easier time escaping through the barrier.

Thermionic emission process is sufficiently described by the Richardson-Dushman model.

Zz.
 

1. What is the Free Electron Theory?

The Free Electron Theory is a scientific theory that explains the behavior of electrons in solid materials. It proposes that electrons in metals are not bound to specific atoms, but instead are free to move throughout the material.

2. How does the Free Electron Theory explain electrical conductivity?

The theory states that the free electrons in metals are responsible for the material's ability to conduct electricity. When a voltage is applied, the free electrons move in response to the electric field, creating a flow of current.

3. Are there any limitations to the Free Electron Theory?

While the theory is useful for explaining the behavior of electrons in metals, it does not account for the behavior of electrons in non-metallic materials such as insulators. It also does not explain the effects of temperature on electron behavior.

4. What is the significance of the Free Electron Theory in modern physics?

The Free Electron Theory laid the foundation for our understanding of electronic properties in materials. It has led to advancements in technology, particularly in the fields of electronics and semiconductors.

5. How has the Free Electron Theory evolved over time?

The theory has undergone several revisions and modifications since its initial proposal in the early 20th century. Some of these modifications include the inclusion of quantum mechanical principles and the concept of band theory to better explain the behavior of electrons in materials.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
913
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
359
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
648
Back
Top