Drying rate depending on curvature?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how the curvature of a surface affects the evaporation rate of a water droplet. It is noted that a droplet on a convex surface has a larger surface area compared to one on a concave surface, leading to a potentially faster evaporation rate if other conditions are equal. However, in cases of perfect non-wetting, where the droplet does not spread, the surface area remains the same, resulting in similar evaporation rates. The conversation highlights the importance of contact angle and heat flow in determining evaporation dynamics. Ultimately, the curvature's impact on evaporation is contingent on specific conditions like surface area and wetting properties.
jangheej
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hi all =D
i have a question about evaporation rate depending on curvature.
say a droplet of water is placed on a curved surface- one concave, one convex but with the same radius of curvature.
will the evaporation rate be different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the one with the larger surface area that evaporates faster.
 
jangheej said:
hi all =D
i have a question about evaporation rate depending on curvature.
say a droplet of water is placed on a curved surface- one concave, one convex but with the same radius of curvature.
will the evaporation rate be different?

If the drop radius is less than that of the curved surface and the contact angle is the same for both cases, the drop on a convex surface will have a larger surface area and thus evaporate faster.
 
Andy Resnick said:
If the drop radius is less than that of the curved surface and the contact angle is the same for both cases, the drop on a convex surface will have a larger surface area and thus evaporate faster.


different surface area? why?
the droplet is just resting on the surface (see the image below)
 

Attachments

  • e.jpg
    e.jpg
    3.3 KB · Views: 396
jangheej said:
different surface area? why?
the droplet is just resting on the surface (see the image below)

You drew a very special case- perfect non-wetting. In that case, there is hardly any heat flow from the surface to the droplet. And since the surface area is the same for the two cases, the rate of evaporation should be about the same.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top