Solving the Rocking Motion of a Dumbbell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Jeans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a dumbbell in circular orbit, where the goal is to determine the angular frequency of its rocking motion about a stable equilibrium position. The stable equilibrium occurs at an angle of φ = π, while the unstable equilibrium is at φ = 0. The user is struggling to incorporate the orbital frequency ω_0 into their calculations when setting up a Lagrangian equation for the motion of φ. They seek guidance on the correct method to approach the problem, emphasizing the importance of including the ω_0 term to arrive at the correct solution. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying Lagrangian mechanics in this context.
Math Jeans
Messages
347
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A dumbbell consisting of two spheres of mass \frac{m}{2}, and connected by a massless rod of length 2a is in circular orbit. The dumbbell is at radius r_0 from the planet, and orbits with frequency \omega_0. The angle of the dumbbell to the downward gravitational force is given by \phi.

The position of stable equilibrium for the dumbbell is when \phi=\pi, and the position of unstable equilibrium is at \phi=0.

The dumbbell is rocking back and forth. Show that the angular frequency of the rocking motion about the stable equilibrium is equal to \omega_0*\sqrt{3}.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I keep attempting to set up a lagrangian equation to describe the motion of \phi, however, my \omega_0 term keeps dropping out at the beginning of my calculations, so I know right there that the answer will turn out wrong.

What method am I supposed to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. Please please please, this is really important.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top