Durabilty of sealed radioactive samples

  • Thread starter Thread starter sim0e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radioactive
AI Thread Summary
The durability of sealed radioactive samples, such as Am-Be neutron sources, is a critical concern in laboratory settings. Regular handling with steel forceps can potentially compromise their sealed state, posing contamination risks to users if not managed properly. Typically, these sources have a confinement lifetime, like the 10 years for Am-Be sources, after which they must be returned for inspection or re-sealing. Regular inspections and strict training protocols are essential to ensure safety and proper handling in case of accidents. The strength and type of radioactive source significantly influence its safety and handling procedures.
sim0e
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Having recently been engaged in a laboratory class involving the measurement of the activity of various sealed radioactive samples, I am curious to know how durable these 'sealed' disks are...

My question is, how long does it take for its 'sealed' state to become diminished through regular contact with steel forceps (moving the samples to Geiger counter) and pose a danger - i.e. spreading radioactive material around workspace area to unprotected students?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know all of the rules, but usually a radioactive source is given to a laboratory for use during a specified time, which is normally such that the confinement is guaranteed. You have a certain license time for using the source. Sources are also regularly inspected for damage.
For instance, we use Am-Be neutron sources which have a confinement lifetime of 10 years. After 10 years, they have to be handed in and they will or be considered as waste and handled as such, or will be re-sealed. They are also inspected every year to see if no mechanical damage is done to the source. Also, normally every person which is endorsed to use the source has had a training which tells him/her what to do in case he has an accident with the source which might potentially damage it (like dropping it accidentally), or when he/she notices something strange with the source. In fact, the thing to do is to seal the area as quickly as possible, to call in radiation protection, and to test everybody who might have been near the area for contamination.

I suppose that this depends on the strength and kind of source, also.
 
What kind of source? Most sealed sources are actually quite weak -- the Cs sources we use for calibration, for example, or even most Th/U/Pu disks. Obviously there are exceptions -- Am-Be neutron sources can be scary (we have several here).
 
Thanks to vanesch and CRGreathouse.

The sources were Am243, Sr90, Co60 and Cs137.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top