How Do I Calculate the Dynamical Matrix for a Crystal with a Pair Potential?

aihaike
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I'm trying to compute the dynamical matrix of a crystal with a pair potential.
One way would be to use the second derivatives of the potential, and an other is to compute it numerically.
Well, in both cases, I get troubles where atom i equal atom j.
Is there something I haven't get yet?
I go through each atoms (i=1,N) and for each pairs I go through each coordinates (x,y,z). But in the analytical expressions of the derevatives there is always 1/r which diverge when r=0.
Numerically I face to the same problem ...
Any advices?
Thanks in advance,

Eric.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume your pair potential has the form:

V(r_1,...,r_N) = \frac12 \sum_{i \neq j} \phi(|r_i - r_j|)

That has N*(N-1) terms in it. When you take the first derivative wrt to a single coordinate, than you end up with N-1 terms. Then you have two different outcomes depending on whether your second derivative is taken with respect to the same coordinate as the first one or not. If it is, then you still have N-1 terms, like:

\frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial r_i^2} = \sum_{j} \left. \frac{\partial^2 \phi(r)}{\partial r^2} \right|_{|r_i-r_j|}

where the sum over j excludes the j=i term.
 
Hi Kanato,

thanks it's clear.
I think I have to sum over 2 different cells to not exclude terms i=j.


Eric.
 
Dear All,
Can some one help me derive a general form of dynamical matrix for lattice more than one atom?
Many thanks in advance,
Sundar
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top