Dynamics Physics - Acceleration Analysis / Gear Ratios /

f2434427@rmqkr
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
First time posting.

Homework Statement



Gears A and B, of Masses 4kg and 10kg, respectively, are rotating about their mass centers. The radius of gyration about the axis of rotation is 100mm for A and 300mm for B. A constant couple of C=0.75Nm acts on gear A. Neglecting friction, compute:

- Angular Acceleration of each gear
- Tangential contact force between the gears at CMay want to look at attachment for image.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Started with the smaller gear.

Using T=I\alpha , where I=mr^2

Rearrange the equation to get \alpha = 0.75 / (4*0.1^2) = 18.75 rad/s^2

Not to sure how to draw a relationship with the 2nd larger gear. Maybe using w1/w2 = r2/r1 then \alpha = w^2 * r

Thanks,
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 1,777
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
The applied torque has to accelerate both gears doesn't it?
If this were a linear case, you'd use a free body diagram to couple the masses wouldn't you?
 
Ah yes, that would make sense. Forgot to account for the 2nd gears inertia

hmm. Dont quite understand what you mean by coupling the masses though
 
When you push on one mass, it pushes on the other one .. the masses are said to be coupled ... the motion of one affects the motion of another.
 
Alrighty,

Well the force applied from gear A, will have an opposite reaction on Gear B.

T=F*d

F=0.75/0.15 = 5n

then applying this force to Gear B.

T=F*D = 5 * 0.45 = 2.25 Nm

alpha = T/I = 2.25/(10*0.3^2) =2.5 rad/s^2Looks about right to me... hopefully. Logically, first gear would have to spin faster than the 2nd.
 
That's right - the smaller gear will reach a higher angular velocity in the same time, so must have a higher acceleration. You should be able to see from the relative sizes how the accelerations are related.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top