Dynamics problem - spring on a slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a dynamics problem involving an elastic spring on a slope, where a mass m moves down the hill and becomes attached to the spring. The key equations include the relationship between spring extension, tension, and the mass's acceleration, leading to a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE). The user struggles with the complexity of the ODE due to numerous constants and attempts different approaches to simplify the problem. They eventually derive a solution involving angular frequency and gravitational effects, seeking confirmation of their findings. The thread highlights the challenges of solving dynamic systems with elastic components and varying forces.
HmBe
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
1. An elastic spring has modulus of elasticity \lambda and natural length l0. This spring is placed on the slope of a hill with an angle \alpha to the horizontal such that one end of the spring is fixed at the foot of the hill and the other end can move freely along the slope. A body of mass m, starting from rest at the top of the hill, is moving down the hill (neglect friction). Knowing that the body sticks permanently to the free end of the spring after first contact, find its subsequent position x(t) for the case:


dx/dt=0 when the spring is compressed by mgl0/{\lambda}



2. F=ma
t=\lambdaL/l0 where L is the extension




3. I set my axis so that the bottom of the hill is x=0, with x increasing along the slope. I then rewrote L as l0-x. Then I found the tension as a function of x, including a -mgsin\alpha. I set this equal to m*d2x/dt2, and divided through by m, to get a ODE. However it is proving really tricky to solve, as I've got loads of constants and stuff I'm not quite sure what I'm meant to do with. I've tried using the initial conditions, but it just gets more and more messy.

This is my first post, sorry about the rubbish formatting. Hope this is in the right section. Let me know if I've done anything wrong. Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I tried a different approach, setting the x-axis so x=0 at l0

L (the extension) = -x

T=-\lambdax/l0

let w2=\lambda/l0m

d2x/dt2+w2x=-gsin\alpha


Working through this I get x=g((sin\alpha-1)coswt-sin\alpha)/w2

Can anyone confirm this..?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top