Dynamics Question/Circular Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oblivion77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the angle at which stones fall off a conveyor belt ending in a pulley. Participants clarify that the normal force becomes zero at the moment the stones detach, allowing them to break free from the surface. The conversation highlights the importance of using the static coefficient of friction, as the kinetic coefficient is irrelevant when the stone slips off. It is emphasized that the tangential speed of the stone will exceed the belt's speed once it reaches a critical angle, leading to a transition to motion governed by gravity. The final approach involves treating the stone's motion as if it were falling down a frictionless cylinder after reaching the critical angle.
Oblivion77
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A constant speed conveyor belt delivers stones and drops them in a bin
as shown. The conveyor ends with a pulley with a 100 mm radius. The
coefficients of friction on the belt are μs = 0.20 and μk = 0. If the velocity
of the pulley is 0.1 m/s, what is the angle,theta, at which the stones fall off the
belt?

ibax47.png



The Attempt at a Solution



I am kinda lost on this question, it says "when the stone falls off the belt" so I am guessing at this moment the normal force is 0? I also don't think there is any tangential acceleration, but I think there would be normal acceleration. If there is no normal force when the stone falls off the rock, would there then be no friction? This is what I got using this method, which doesn't seem possible.

I drew a FBD and got the equation mgCos(theta) = m(v^2/r), the m's will cancel and your left with gCos(theta) = v^2/r, solving for theta you get 89.42 degrees, which seems much too large.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Oblivion77! :smile:
Oblivion77 said:
… it says "when the stone falls off the belt" so I am guessing at this moment the normal force is 0?

No, you're thinking of loop-the-loops, where the stone would be under the belt.

Here, the stone will fall when the slope is so high that it just beats the friction.
I also don't think there is any tangential acceleration, but I think there would be normal acceleration.

Yes, that's right … the speed is constant, so the tangential acceleration is zero.

The normal acceleration is a matter of geometry, not physics … for speed v, it's … ? :smile:

(and then use N µN mg and a)
 
So would I be using static coefficient of friction? Would the kinetic coefficient of friction come into play?
 
No, µk won't be relevant … the stone will not slip until µs is "reached". :wink:
 
Im doing the same assignment. No, Tim is wrong.
-yes the normal force will be zero when it falls off, that's what allows it to break free from the surface. This is true for any example.

-If you draw a free body diagram at the point where it falls off, you'll see that all you have is the weight MG and that as a result you have resultant forces in the normal AND TANGENTIAL direction. You can't assume that the velocity is constant. And it isnt.
WHY? Because when the block starts slipping the velocity of the block starts to increase, otherwise it wouldn't be slipping... slipping would mean that there exists a relative velocity between the belt and the block, if the velocity is constant (same as belt) this won't happen.

-Uk of 0 simply tells you that when the block is slipping the only thing that is changing its velocity is the force of gravity acting on it, because there is no friction. It makes calculations easier and allows you to use energy, which normally cannot be used with friction (at least with what we have learned) because this is a thermal energy.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Jaz! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a mu: µ :wink:)

Yes, I think you're right :redface: … I was answering when the stone would slip, not when it would slip off. :rolleyes:

Once it reaches the critical angle θk, the tangential component of g will be greater than µsN, and its tangential speed will become greater than v, with the motion being governed by µk, which in this case is given as zero.

So we find θk, and then treat it as if the stone were falling down a frictionless stationary cylinder, starting at θk with speed v (using energy, as you suggest).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top