E and B fields and Electromagnetic radiation

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation are distinct concepts, with radiation being a manifestation of the field that propagates energy and momentum. A stationary point charge generates an electric field but does not emit radiation, allowing it to exert forces on other stationary charges through this field. When two non-stationary charges interact, their fields overlap, resulting in forces such as repulsion, which can be explained through classical electromagnetic theory rather than quantum mechanics. The interaction of fields is influenced by their oscillation; only moving charges or varying field strengths produce electromagnetic radiation. Understanding these principles often begins with Maxwell's equations before delving into more complex theories.
kasap
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am having a lot of trouble in determining the difference between an electromagnetic field and electromagnetic radiation. Is an electromagnetic field caused by electromagnetic radiation within the space of which the field acts over? However if I am right a point charge that is not moving has an electric field but emits no radiation, if this is the case then how can it exert a force on another charged particle that is also stationary within a certain distance without the means of electromagnetic radiation for their interaction?

Also what actually happens when two fields meet, e.g with two non-stationary positive point charges, what goes on in terms of the fields/radiation that makes them both feel a force of repulsion? (Are there any theories which could explain this other than boson exchange?)

Sorry if this isn't very clear, thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Boson exchange?

Go back to the fundamentals, if you only just found Maxwell's equations then I wouldn't worry about quantum field theories just yet.

Electromagnetic radiation is just a particular manifestation of the electromagnetic field.
 
Well like mikeph said the em field has various ways of intraction also the eletric and magnetic side of the field is somewhat trivial if you want to understand it and it usually comes later with Special relativity.Because if you have a point charge it has a electric field and if your other point charge travels past that first point charge at an angle (perfectly at 90 degrees aka perpendicular) then the traveling point charge experiences a magnetic field.That's for short.

A point charge with just an electric field emits no radiation radiation is usually described in EM as something that has frequency , in other words something has to oscillate for it to have frequency , either the strength of field must vary with time or some physical object that has some charge has to move physically , well there are different ways but it's easy to remember that something oscillates when there is EM radiation.
the term which described how fast something oscillates is frequency , in EM you can have starting from very low , a few hz say up to the speed of light.Which is the shortest wavelength aka the highest frequency.
 
Electromagnetic radiation is the part of the electromagnetic field that propagates and carries energy and momentum. If you do a multipole expansion of the sources, you might be able to separate the static part from the propagating part. A stationary magnet has a magnetic field but doesn't emit radiation. If you spin the magnet, you have a static part of the field and also radiation. The radiation intensity drops off as 1/r^2, but the static field drops off as 1/r^3 for this case (of a magnetic dipole), so the radiation is more important at far distances.
 
The energy-momentum of an electromagnetic field is a property of the field itself. The energy-momentum carried by a radiation field (a null field if you want to think of it in terms of SR) is a specific case.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top