Does an Electric Field Exponentially Decrease in Free Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter win_lan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drop Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an electric field can decrease exponentially in free space, starting from a potential function that decays exponentially in the y-direction. The Laplacian of the potential is calculated, leading to a differential equation for the function F. The solution suggests that the exponential term may cancel out, raising questions about its validity in the context of electric fields. A participant points out the omission of a separation constant in the differential equation, indicating that this might affect the conclusions drawn about the potential and electric field. The conversation highlights the complexities of solving such equations in electrostatics.
win_lan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can an electric field drops exponentially? (in free space)

Homework Equations


Starting from a hypothetical potential, V = F(x,y,z)e^{-y^2} which decays exponentially in the y direction
\nabla^2V=0

The Attempt at a Solution


\nabla^2V=e^{-y^2}(\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial z^2}+\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial y^2}-4y\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}+(4y^2-2)F)=0
Using separable variable, the general solution of \frac{\partial^2F}{\partial y^2}-4y\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}+(4y^2-2)F=0 has the form (A+By)e^{y^2}, assuming that all general solutions of the above equation can be expressed as a linear combination of the product of the 3 individual solution of the separable variable, we can see that the exponential term will cancel out.

I am not sure how to proceed from here, is this correct? does it mean we cannot have the exponential term in either potential or e field?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the separation constant, i.e.

\frac{\partial^2F}{\partial y^2}-4y\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}+(4y^2-2)F=k^2
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top