E-field inside a non-conducting hollow pear.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aesteus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field
AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field inside a hollow non-conducting pear with a varying surface charge density, the discussion emphasizes the use of symmetry and Gauss's law. The charge density is zero at the top and 600 C/m^2 at the bottom, leading to the conclusion that the electric field inside the pear can be determined by superposition of fields in the x, y, and z directions. It is noted that due to the lack of enclosed charge within the hollow region, the electric field is zero overall, although the z-component may be non-zero. The approach suggests that applying Laplace's equation could be beneficial, but the primary conclusion rests on Gauss's law. Understanding the implications of the charge distribution is crucial for accurately determining the electric field.
Aesteus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the electric field inside a hollow non-conducting pear with a surface charge-distribution (axially symmetric too) of σ(r,θ). The charge density σ is zero at the top of the pear, and 600 C/m^2 at the bottom.

Homework Equations



I'm not sure how to approach the problem ... maybe some application of Laplace's equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



The electric field at any point inside the pear will be the superposition of x,y, and z fields. I assume that we can use symmetry about the z-axis to our advantage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, it's just a simple application of gauss' law on the inside of the object yielding E=0 because there is no enclosed charge. (And E-z is non-zero I believe.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top