E field of a hemisperical shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter nosmas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Shell
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field of a hemispherical shell, specifically focusing on the z component due to symmetry, which eliminates the x and y components. The teacher demonstrated the calculation by slicing the shell into rings, where each ring's z component can be treated as if the charge were concentrated at a point. The formula used involves multiplying the charge of the ring by the inverse square of the distance, adjusted by the cosine of the angle. The distance to the point of interest is defined as z = rcos(θ), and the charge on each ring is derived from the charge density multiplied by the area of the ring. Overall, the explanation clarifies the method of calculating the electric field from a hemispherical shell.
nosmas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
My teacher explained a problem of a hemispherical shell in class but i don't understand what he is doing.

http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/7656/naamloos27mf.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi nosmas! welcome to pf! :wink:

(he only worked out the z component, because from symmetry the x and y components must be zero)

he sliced the shell into rings because for any one ring, the z component of the field must be the same …

so if the total charge of that ring is q, then it has the same effect (on the z component) as a charge q all at one point (instead of spread out around the ring)

then he multiplied charge x 1/distance2 x cosθ
(he seems to have unnecessarily put in a lot of r's that then canceled …

i expect that's because they were in Eq 23-10)
 
Equation 23-10 is dE = k*(dQ/r^2)

What I am struggeling with is how the distance to the point of interest z = rcos(theta) and how they came up with the charge on the ring?
 
hi nosmas! :smile:
nosmas said:
What I am struggeling with is how the distance to the point of interest z = rcos(theta) and how they came up with the charge on the ring?

rcosθ is the distance from the centre to the plane of the ring

the charge is the charge density times the area,

and the area is the arc-length (rdθ) times the circumference of the ring (2πrsinθ)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top