E-field of non-conducting, nonuniform shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pixter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field Shell
Pixter
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Right have a shell that has a volym charge distribution P=(G/r^2) and with inner radius a and outer radius b.

Now what is the e-field at r<a, a<r<b, r>b


Homework Equations



gauss's law: surfaceint[E.da]=Qenclosed/epsilon0
Qenc=volymint[PdV)



The Attempt at a Solution



Right this is what i tried.

for r<a: there is no enclosed charge so E is zero at all points.

for a<r<b:

well first E is radially outwards and normal to the surface so the gauss integral just go to
E4[pi]r^2

Qenclosed=volymint[PdV] between r and a

goes to -> volymint[(G/r^2)(4[pi]r^2)dr] -> 4[pi]G*volymint[dr] evulated at r and a

-> 4[pi]G(r-a)

and E4[pi]r^2=(4[pi]G(r-a))/epsilon0
which then goes to -> E=(G(r-a))/(epsilon0*r^2)

then for r>b:

it's the same calc as for a<r<b but we end up with E=(G(b-a))/(epsilon0*r^2)


now I'm wondering have I done something wrong and if I had to plot it on a graph where we have E/r then for the first part upto a E would be zero and for the part where r>b it would follow a 1/r^2 relation, but how do i figure out the realation for part a<r<b, my algebra seems to suck a bit.. =)

but yeah.. does this look correct?
and if so, can you help me or give me a hint hwo to work out the relation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am having some difficulty reading your equation, so I would not comment on them...

For r<a, E=0..
For a<r<b, E grows linearly..
For b<r, E = Q/r^2 whereas Q = the total charge in the shell..
E is continuous at r = a and r = b..

If your solution satisfy the conditions above, your solution should be correct...
 
chanvincent said:
I am having some difficulty reading your equation, so I would not comment on them...

For r<a, E=0..
For a<r<b, E grows linearly..
For b<r, E = Q/r^2 whereas Q = the total charge in the shell..
E is continuous at r = a and r = b..

If your solution satisfy the conditions above, your solution should be correct...

pretty sure you are wrong.. outside the spherical shell E will be proportinal to 1/r^2 as for any other spherical charge..

but inside the shell it will be proportinal to (1/r)-(1/r^2) following my equations, becuase the shell doesn't have uniform charge..

also note the shell is non-conducting..
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top