E=mc^2 states mass and energy are interchangeable but ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Einstein's equation E=mc^2 and Dalton's law of constant mass. E=mc^2 illustrates the interchangeability of mass and energy, primarily observable in nuclear reactions, while Dalton's law states that in a chemical reaction, the mass of the products equals the mass of the reactants. Participants clarify that Dalton's law applies to chemical reactions where electrons are exchanged and bonds are formed or broken, without involving nuclear processes. They emphasize that while E=mc^2 is relevant to all systems, the mass-energy change in chemical reactions is negligible compared to the mass itself, making Dalton's law practically valid. The discussion concludes that there is no violation of Dalton's law, as the mass-energy equivalence means total mass and energy remain constant, even if minute changes occur.
jagdishdash
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
e=mc^2 states mass and energy are interchangeable but ??

But daltons law of constabt mass is voilated as states that while a reaction the mass of product = mass of reactant
any explanations?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think you're mixing apples and oranges here. Einstein's E=mc^2 applies to nuclear reactions whereas Dalton's law applies specifically to chemical reactions.

In a chemical reaction, electrons are interchanged, bonds are made, others are broken and energy is either given off or absorbed but no nuclear reactions are happening.
 
jedishrfu said:
I think you're mixing apples and oranges here. Einstein's E=mc^2 applies to nuclear reactions whereas Dalton's law applies specifically to chemical reactions.

In a chemical reaction, electrons are interchanged, bonds are made, others are broken and energy is either given off or absorbed but no nuclear reactions are happening.


ok thankyou so much jedishrfu
my past 3 year doubt is now cleared thankyou so much
 
jagdishdash said:
But daltons law of constabt mass is voilated as states that while a reaction the mass of product = mass of reactant
any explanations?
An oxygen molecule is also stable, which is another way of saying that it takes energy E to pull two oxygen atoms apart. So you could think of the animation as representing a stable molecule. However, the binding energies of molecules are much less than those of nuclei, and so the masses involved are smaller. A typical chemical reaction might involve a nett energy of 30 kJ per mole, or 5 x 10-20 J per molecule. So the change in mass is 5 x 10-37 kg, which is only .0001% of the mass of an electron.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module5_binding.htm
In other words that change in mass is very small and hence negligible for molecules (not the same for nuclei-see link.).
 
There is no violation because since mass and energy are equivalent, Dalton's Law is truly saying that the total of mass and energy remain constant (since they are equivalent), which it does.
 
jedishrfu said:
I think you're mixing apples and oranges here. Einstein's E=mc^2 applies to nuclear reactions whereas Dalton's law applies specifically to chemical reactions.

In a chemical reaction, electrons are interchanged, bonds are made, others are broken and energy is either given off or absorbed but no nuclear reactions are happening.

You are wrong. E=mc2 is not about nuclear reactions, it is about mass and energy equivalence. Yes, it is most easily observable in nuclear reactions, but it doesn't mean it doesn't hold for other systems.

In chemical reactions - strictly speaking - mass of products is NOT equal to mass of reactants when we take mass energy equivalence into consideration. However, the difference is many orders of magnitude lower than the accuracy with which we can weight substances involved, so for all practical purposes Dalton's law holds.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top