Early universe: equilibrium before nucleosynthesis

Davide82
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I am studying the evolution of the universe.
In particular, I am reading the history of the universe happening just under a temperature of 100 MeV.
At this time, it is said that neutrons and protons are present along with some other particles: electrons, positrons, photons, neutrinos and anti-neutrinos.
They say the reactions which maintain kinetic equilibrium are:
e^- + e^+ \longleftrightarrow \gamma +\gamma
e^\pm + \gamma \longleftrightarrow e^\pm + \gamma
while the reactions which are responsible for both kinetic and chemical equilibrium are:
e^- + e^+ \longleftrightarrow \nu + \bar\nu
\nu + e^- \longleftrightarrow e^- + \nu
n + \nu_e \longleftrightarrow p + e^-
n + e^+ \longleftrightarrow p + \bar\nu_e
n \longleftrightarrow p + e^- + \bar\nu_e
I am wondering why reactions such as:
\nu + \bar\nu \longleftrightarrow \gamma + \gamma
p + e^+ \longleftrightarrow p + e^+
p + e^- \longleftrightarrow n + \nu_e + e^+ + e^-
are not taken into account.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am sorry that the TeX-interpreter doesn't seem to render my post...
 
here it is in a more readable manner:

I am studying the evolution of the universe.
In particular, I am reading the history of the universe happening just under a temperature of 100 MeV.
At this time, it is said that neutrons and protons are present along with some other particles: electrons, positrons, photons, neutrinos and anti-neutrinos.
They say the reactions which maintain kinetic equilibrium are:

e- + e+ <---> photon + photon
e+- + photon <---> e+- + photon

while the reactions which are responsible for both kinetic and chemical equilibrium are:

e- + e+ <---> neutrino + anti-neutrino
neutrino + e- <---> e- + neutrino
n + neutrino(e) <---> p + e-
n + e+ <---> p + anti-neutrino(e)
n <---> p + e- + anti-neutrino(e)

I am wondering why reactions such as:

neutrino + anti-neutrino <---> photon + photon
p + e+ <---> p + e+
p + e- <---> n + anti-neutrino(e) + e+ + e-

are not taken into account.
 
oh, now the first post with TeX has been fixed!
 
I would assume the cross sections for those last three reactions to be negligibly small. Especially the ones involving neutrinos.
 
I am still digging...
I believe the \nu + \bar\nu \longleftrightarrow \gamma + \gamma is forbidden by the model.
The second maybe is not interesting because the other reactions already take care of the kinetic equilibrium of protons and electrons.
Since these reactions are brought up to make some calculations about their frequencies, maybe the last reaction is not needed because its cross section is similar to the other expressions involving protons and neutrons and the only difference would be the phase space in which the mass of the electron would play a small role? So, basically, we are accounting for it in the others?

I would like to post my question in the astrophysics section of the forum, but I don't know if I am allowed to, or this is considered a bad cross-posting...
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top