Earth orbiting around sun - finding speed with known mass and radius

AI Thread Summary
To find the Earth's orbital speed around the sun, the discussion highlights using the formula for circular motion, specifically the relationship between centripetal force and gravitational force. The user initially struggles with finding the centripetal force without knowing the mass of the sun or the gravitational constant. They later realize that calculating the orbital speed can be simplified by determining the circumference of the orbit and dividing it by the orbital period. The final approach involves using the formula for circumference (2πr) and the time it takes for one complete orbit, which is approximately 365 days. This method provides a straightforward solution to the problem.
EvaSindelarova
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

the problem is stated as following:
The Earth (mass=5.98×1024 kg) rotates around the sun in an orbit that is approximately circular, with a radius of 1.5×1011 m. Find the orbital speed of the Earth around the sun.

[itеx]F=mv/r2[/itеx]

I get that I need to use this equation but I'm struggling with finding centripetal force. I understand it is equal to the force sun exerts on Earth and I solved the problem using equation [itеx]G\frac{mM}{r2}=\frac{mv2}{r}[/itеx] but I don't think it is the right solution according to the book since no information which is needed for this equation such as mass of sun (M) or gravitational constant (G) and we also haven't learned this equation yet.

So how can I find centripetal force without using the force sun exerts on Earth? Or do I even need to use the equation for force mentioned above?

Thank you for any advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the question is to find the orbital speed: How long does it take the Earth to make one trip around the sun?
 
If the radius of the Earth's orbit is 1.5x10^11 m, how far does it travel in completing one orbit? How long does this take?
 
Ok, I get it now, I just divide circumference (2∏r) by period (365 days, just in seconds).

Thank you both)
 
Yes, that is the easier way to do it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top