Earth Radius: Who Measured & What Method Used?

  • Thread starter Thread starter todopoderoso17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Radius
AI Thread Summary
Eratosthenes accurately measured the Earth's radius over 2,000 years ago, using methods that demonstrated the Earth’s roundness long before Columbus. Contrary to popular belief, educated individuals of Columbus's time recognized the Earth was spherical; however, Columbus underestimated its size. He mistakenly thought the Earth was smaller because he couldn't conceive of land existing on the opposite side of the globe. Additionally, medieval scholars relied on Ptolemy's inaccurate calculations, which contributed to misconceptions about the Earth's dimensions. This discussion highlights the importance of Eratosthenes' work in correcting historical misunderstandings of Earth's size.
todopoderoso17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Someone knows who measured the Earth Radius and the methods that used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://didaktik.physik.uni-essen.de/~backhaus/Venusproject/Earth'sradius.htm
http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys240/homework/earth_radius/earth_rad.html
http://muweb.millersville.edu/~physics/exp.of.the.month/58/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The last of those websites given by robphy:
http://muweb.millersville.edu/~phys...f.the.month/58/
is probably the one you want since it talks about Eratosthenes and how he determined the radius of the earth.

By the way: notice that he did that about 2000 years before Columbus! The myth has it that Columbus believed the Earth was round while everyone else thought it was flat. That is nonsense, of course, any educated person of the time, and certainly any ship captain or navigator, knew perfectly well that the Earth was round. The truth is that Columbus believed the Earth was much smaller than Erastosthenes calculation. And, of course, he was WRONG!

The reason Columbus (and many others) believed the Earth was much smaller than that is interesting: they simply believed that it didn't make sense that all of the land area was on one side of the Earth and only ocean on the other! Apparently it never occurred to them that there were other lands on the other side of the earth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Halls, there was another reason scholars in the Middle Ages thought the Earth was smaller than Eratosthenes said; their source was Ptolemy, and he had the circumference of the Earth equivalent to 16,000 miles instead of 24,000. This wasn't the only case in which Ptolemy gave a bogus number that confused later generations. He was a good calculator but a somewhat feckless and less than honest observer.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top