Earthquake analysis (motion along a straight line)

AI Thread Summary
Earthquakes generate P-waves and S-waves, with P-waves traveling at approximately 6.5 km/s and S-waves at about 3.5 km/s. The time delay between the arrival of these waves helps geologists determine the distance to the earthquake's epicenter. In this case, a 33-second delay indicates that the P-wave traveled for 38.5 seconds, resulting in a distance of 250 km from the seismic station. The calculations were verified by checking the time difference against the known speeds of the waves. The solution confirms the method used is correct.
physstudent1
Messages
267
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Earthquakes produce several types of shock waves. The most well known are the P-waves (primary or pressure) and the S-waves (secondary or shear). In the Earth's crust, the P-waves travel at around 6.5km/s, while the S-waves move at about 3.5km/s. The actual speeds vary depending on the type of material they are going through. The time delay between the arrival of these two waves at a seismic recording station tells geologists how far away the earthquake occurred. If the time delay is 33s, how far from the seismic station did the earthquake occur?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that the time delay will mean after the first P-wave is recorded it takes 33 seconds for the S-wave to get there, meaning the P-wave will get there in some time and then the S-wave will get there in some time + 33 seconds.

So I set up:
3.5(33+t) = 6.5t
t=38.5 seconds which is how long the P-wave traveled;
Which means the displacement from where the earthquake started is 38.5(6.5) = 250km. I'm not sure if this is right or the right way to do it if someone could just check over it that would be great, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey, I just went through your calculations, and it looks good to me. A quick way to check if you had the right answer is like this:

\Delta t = t_{s} - t_{p} = \frac{250.25 km}{3.5 km s^{-1}} - \frac{250.25 km}{6.5 kms^{-1}} = 33s

Which obviously shows you're right. Well done! :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top