Earth's gravitational field strength

AI Thread Summary
To determine the altitude where Earth's gravitational field strength is two-thirds and one-third of its surface value, the radius of Earth (6.371 x 10^3 km) must be used in calculations. The gravitational force formula F = GMm/r^2 is relevant, but the mass of the second object is not needed as it cancels out. The acceleration due to gravity at the surface is 9.8 m/s², which can be adjusted for the desired gravitational strength at the specified altitudes. The key is to set the radius equal to the Earth's radius plus the altitude and solve for the altitude. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
D4b34r5
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a) Find the altitude above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be two-thirds of its value at the surface. Assume re = 6.371 multiplied by 10^3 km.
wrong check mark km
(b) Find the altitude above the Earth's surface where Earth's gravitational field strength would be one-third of its value at the surface.
wrong check mark km

[Hint: First find the radius for each situation; then recall that the altitude is the distance from the surface to a point above the surface. Use proportional reasoning.]

Homework Equations


F = GMm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried it and I am either calculating wrong or setting it up wrong... or both. One problem I see with the formula is that it doesn't have the mass of the second object.. so I don't know what to do there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you do not need to know the mass of the second object. F=ma and the masses of the second object cancel out. a=9.8m/s^2 on Earth and at the point above the Earth a=9.8/3 let r=radius of Earth + altitude. then plug in and solve for a.
 
Sorry but that still isn't helping me. Are you just using the F=ma formula?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Gravitational equipotential multiple choice problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Gravitational Field Multiple Choice Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
Gravitational field strength of a mass
Replies
17
Views
2K
Proportionality of gravitational fields
Replies
3
Views
1K
Gravitational Field Strength at the equator and poles
Replies
23
Views
3K
Gravitational field strength at a point
Replies
9
Views
4K
Finding the weight of an object submerged in water
Replies
17
Views
4K
Earth's Gravitational Field Strength
Replies
4
Views
34K
Gravitational field strength (ratios)
Replies
3
Views
4K
Finding Altitude: Calculating Earth's Gravitational Field Strength
Replies
1
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top