Easy Energy Conservation Problem causing me trouble

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a block dropped onto a spring, requiring the calculation of the block's speed at a specific spring compression. The user initially calculated the elastic energy at two compression points but neglected to account for gravitational potential energy in their energy balance. They realized that not all elastic energy converts to kinetic energy, as some remains as potential energy in the spring. The correct approach involves incorporating gravitational potential energy to accurately determine the block's speed. The user seeks clarification on their calculations and acknowledges the need to consider all forms of energy involved.
motoxkx
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Problem:
A 3.30kg block is dropped from a height of 5.70m onto a spring of spring constant 3806 N/m. When the block is momentarily at rest, the spring has compressed by 32.0 cm. Find the speed of the block when the compression of the spring is 13.5cm.

How I approached it:
Calculate the the elastic energy when the spring is compressed 32.0cm. Then subtract the elastic energy when the spring is compressed 13.5cm. Then that energy would be the current kinetic energy, and I determined velocity from that. However, this is not giving me the correct answer.

Calculations:
Elastic Energy at 32.0cm
E = .5kx^2 = .5*3806*.32^2 = 194.8672 J

Elastic Energy at 13.5cm
E = .5kx^2 = .5*3806*.135^2 = 34.682 J

Subtract the potential energy remaining
194.8672 - 34.682 = 160.185 J

Find velocity
Ke = .5mv^2
160.185 = .5*3.30*v^2
v = 9.85 m/s

Where am I going wrong? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
motoxkx said:
How I approached it:
Calculate the the elastic energy when the spring is compressed 32.0cm. Then subtract the elastic energy when the spring is compressed 13.5cm. Then that energy would be the current kinetic energy, and I determined velocity from that. However, this is not giving me the correct answer.
Don't forget to include gravitational PE in your energy calculations.
 
Doesn't all of the gravitational potential energy become elastic potential energy when the spring is compressed 25 cm?
 
Ah, never mind to my last post, I see where the potential energy comes into play because not all of the elastic energy is converted into kenitic energy, and some becomes potential energy. Thank you for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top